New answers tagged solr
1
The solution to this is to use the following function overload:
ContentSearchResult[ObjectIndexerKey key].
Example Query:
queryable = queryable.Where(p =>
((DateTime)p[(ObjectIndexerKey)"Date"]) > lastWeek.Boost(4f)
);
Note: The boost above does not appear to be translated in the query
1
Sitecore was able to get back to me with a response on my ticket:
We have tested this with some sample code something like the following:
Sitecore.Data.Database master = Sitecore.Configuration.Factory.GetDatabase("master");
Sitecore.Data.Items.Item test = master.GetItem("/sitecore/content/MyTenant/MySite/Home/Test");
Sitecore.Data.Items....
1
To filter suggestion result only particular path, there is three possible solutions:
Option 1:
Set contextField as _fullpath and pass path in ContextFilterQuery
<str name="contextField">_fullpath</str>
using (var context = ContentSearchManager.GetIndex("sitecore_master_index").CreateSearchContext())
{
...
0
You can find location here server\solr\configsets\sitecore_configs\conf to update managed-schema file.
After update, run below command to deploy config:
solr zk upconfig -d sitecore_configs -n sitecore -z localhost:$zookeeperPort
0
You can set indexType as UNTOKENIZED which means "Phrases will be stored as a whole – the entire value of the field, essentially" so it will consider 17-H as a single word instead of break into different words. You can do like below:
<field fieldName="displayname" storageType="YES" indexType="UNTOKENIZED" />
1
Unfortunately, this doesn't work in Sitecore 9.3: https://doc.sitecore.com/en/developers/93/platform-administration-and-architecture/search-result-boosting.html
You can store the viewsCount in an indexed field and sort by it. Or move away from LINQ and directly query Solr.
2
I was not able to find the direct cause of this issue but I have found a possible solution.
When using the Like function with the slop parameter Like<T>(this T value, string phraseComparison, int slop), it formats the query correctly without the backslashes. From the logs: _content:("Test query Test test"~1)
I believe the phrase query is ...
0
You can also create Solr queries directly and run them against SOLR through a GET call. Gives you a lot more control and flexibility. Could be a rather big change though for your project.
https://lucidworks.com/post/use-solr-boost-function/
Top 50 recent answers are included