Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 15, 2020 at 3:38 answer added Kamruzzaman Titu timeline score: 1
Aug 1, 2018 at 13:57 comment added Mark Cassidy please stop editing "Data Exchange Framework" back in its title after being removed by a moderator. The tag will automatically be added for SEO purposes in SSE posts. See: i.imgur.com/ZPcsnhu.png
Aug 1, 2018 at 13:53 history edited Mark Cassidy CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Aug 1, 2018 at 3:50 vote accept Steve Ward
Aug 1, 2018 at 3:50 answer added Steve Ward timeline score: 2
S Jul 6, 2018 at 3:05 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Jul 6, 2018 at 3:05 history notice removed CommunityBot
Jul 4, 2018 at 11:30 answer added Bart Verdonck timeline score: 0
Jul 3, 2018 at 8:31 comment added Mark Cassidy Probably. When importing data that was written to index, I've either a) always made sure that whatever needed to be read during the process, came directly from source. e.g. the Sitecore DB. Or b) made sure that every item processed was also stored in memory, for other steps to consume later.
Jul 2, 2018 at 23:27 comment added Steve Ward If I pause indexing using "IndexCustodian.PauseIndexing", then I get an error "There is no method 'GetResults' on type 'Sitecore.ContentSearch.Linq.QueryableExtensions" when the Data Exchange Framework tries to resolve the next Sitecore item using the index. I'm thinking using our own implementation for the resolve routine that doesnt use the index may be the only way..
Jul 2, 2018 at 8:31 comment added Mark Cassidy I normally did pause indexing when doing migration runs. However, the way I did it back then is likely not valid any longer. Sitecore.Configuration.Settings.Indexing.Enabled = false;
Jul 2, 2018 at 6:06 comment added Steve Ward I've tried pausing indexing using Sitecore.ContentSearch.Maintenance.IndexCustodian.PauseIndex() but then Im getting an error "There is no method 'GetResults' on type 'Sitecore.ContentSearch.Linq.QueryableExtensions: which is called internally by the Data Exchange Framework
Jul 2, 2018 at 4:56 comment added Steve Ward Thanks Mark. Im wondering if there is away to disable the indexing while the batch import is running and then do a re-index at the end. Ever tried this?
Jun 28, 2018 at 7:10 comment added Mark Cassidy I've remained quiet since I've no first hand experience with the DEF. However. It is a common mistake when doing migration processes, to rely on values being written to an index and to be later consumed later in the process. Index writes are asynchronous and you can never rely on reading back a value from any index without special precautions.
Jun 28, 2018 at 1:44 history edited Steve Ward CC BY-SA 4.0
added 11 characters in body
S Jun 28, 2018 at 1:27 history bounty started Steve Ward
S Jun 28, 2018 at 1:27 history notice added Steve Ward Draw attention
Jun 28, 2018 at 1:26 history edited Steve Ward CC BY-SA 4.0
Added more detail and latest findings
Jun 21, 2018 at 7:04 history edited Mark Cassidy CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Jun 21, 2018 at 6:39 answer added Vlad Shpak timeline score: 2
Jun 21, 2018 at 5:59 history asked Steve Ward CC BY-SA 4.0